Engineering always involves trade-offs. The right architecture for the military in Iraq might not be the right architecture for sharing cookie recipes with your family

True but supply chain attacks are real. A good security plan needs multiple layers, this seems like a good one to include.

In my experience the accuracy was fine but actually reading the output was so annoying I removed it.

Had a little luck with having it do an impression of the Star Trek computer, although at the cost of having it try to insert star-trek themed hallucinations like warp engine status.

What's your definition of "required". I usually don't tip ride share drivers

you should

Why? It's much better if people's salaries are predictable and not dependent on random guilt-induced tips.

Why?

No, tipping encourages wage suppression and the wealth gap. Pay your workers a sensible wage instead, stop the games.

America in a nutshell. We won't do anything about mass shooting events besides hold up deployment of a life saving technology.

Engineering should be exactly as rigorous as the task requires. Anything more is wasteful.

A conversation with your boss about a COLA raise really shouldn't include your own personal finances. "I just bought a house" is not a good reason for a raise; "prices in our area have increased" is a much better one

You sure can, by not using Claude code.

You can set billing/usage limits pretty easily. And the default settings on subscription (IIRC) are no extra usage. So I have no idea how they could bankrupt someone like that.

You'll notice by the crappy output assuming you're paying any attention at all